The upcoming NCIS spinoff faces tough odds compared to its recently canceled predecessor.
The past few months have been challenging for the NCIS franchise and its fans. Despite expanding with two new series, some shows haven’t fared well. The cancellation of “NCIS: Hawai’i” has left its dedicated fanbase rallying for its return, with many attributing its demise to the introduction of another spinoff, “NCIS: Origins.”
“NCIS: Origins” has already faced criticism, with fans deeming it unnecessary. Even before its official release, it’s perceived as an unwelcome addition, merely rehashing the well-known backstory of young Leroy Jethro Gibbs. Critics argue it contributed to the cancellation of “NCIS: Hawai’i,” a show that offered fresh, compelling content throughout its three-season run.
A Reddit thread from about a month ago encapsulates this sentiment. Users argue that Gibbs’ story, thoroughly explored over the original show’s 19 seasons, needs no further elaboration. They suggest that “NCIS: Origins” is unlikely to add anything of value and lament its arrival at the expense of the beloved “NCIS: Hawai’i,” which had been performing well in ratings.
One user commented that Gibbs was a “two-dimensional” character whose story had been fully told, while “NCIS: Hawai’i” was considered much more important. This viewpoint resonated widely, garnering significant upvotes and agreement.
Both “NCIS: Origins” and the original show’s 22nd season are set to premiere on CBS this fall.
